Chevy V8 Scale Engine Plane

Discussion in 'Plans' started by TrashCo, Jan 23, 2014.

Help Support HMEM by donating:

  1. May 20, 2019 #101

    retailer

    retailer

    retailer

    Junior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2011
    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    40
    Apart from the bore and stroke being copied from the PeeWee V4 my plans are not really based on any particular engine, the crank layout and firing order are the same as a small block chev but then there's probably many engines out there that follow the same firing order, while I call it my own design, you could say that word design is used rather loosely as I can see many many images of V8 engines on the internet and then it's just a matter of scaling it down and juggling dimensions and clearances to get it to fit, once I have a part drawn I print it full size so I can get an idea of what it will look like in real life, so I guess you could it is just copying.

    I'm drawing it up in autocad and also modelling it in fusion360 mainly to get practice at 3d modelling, I've been using autocad for around 10 yrs and feel quite comfortable with it and even though I know I don't use all the features offered I can get by and produce reasonable drawings. Fusion360 is new to me since last xmas and is something I would like to get better at.
     
  2. May 20, 2019 #102

    doc1955

    doc1955

    doc1955

    Gone

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2009
    Messages:
    1,098
    Likes Received:
    70
    Occupation:
    Retired Former Tool Design Engineer
    Yes I like to have things modeled up before building anything. I like to check fits and stuff first.
     
  3. May 20, 2019 #103

    SailplaneDriver

    SailplaneDriver

    SailplaneDriver

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2017
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    13
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired Electrical Engineer
    Location:
    Woodinville, WA
    Saves on making liners. ;)
     
  4. May 20, 2019 #104

    SailplaneDriver

    SailplaneDriver

    SailplaneDriver

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2017
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    13
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired Electrical Engineer
    Location:
    Woodinville, WA
    Spent a bunch of time sizing stock and screwing up the dimensions of the main bearing caps. Why is it I screw up on the simple things like cutting these steps? Both sides went too far to the center and the right side excessively so. I was using a vise stop so I screwed up all three. Not paying enough attention I guess. Will try again today.

    IMG_20190520_081302.jpg
     
  5. May 22, 2019 #105

    SailplaneDriver

    SailplaneDriver

    SailplaneDriver

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2017
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    13
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired Electrical Engineer
    Location:
    Woodinville, WA
    Got the main bearing caps done yesterday. Don't have the right length cap screws so ordered them from McMaster. Bored the cylinders to size today, at least the first diameter. Have to do three more operations on each cylinder, two more bores stepped plus a relief for the water jackets. Tedious and unrewarding work since it is merely refining a feature I already made.
     
  6. Jun 8, 2019 #106

    SailplaneDriver

    SailplaneDriver

    SailplaneDriver

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2017
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    13
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired Electrical Engineer
    Location:
    Woodinville, WA
    Finished the block except for the crank and cam bores. Working on the oil pan. Screwed up the first attempt at the pan and working on the second. I don't have any long LOC end mills so ordered some. Can't finish the pan until they arrive. I tried using short LOC mills for the inside of the pan and they rub messing up the finish. Not a problem on the inside but not the look I want on the outside. In the meantime, I made the valve covers.

    IMG_20190608_145410.jpg

    I'm debating whether to start on the crankshaft or the heads next. I'm going to need some help and suggestions on the crank since I have not made a single piece crank before. Any input or links to crank builds would be appreciated.
     
    burkLane likes this.
  7. Jun 10, 2019 #107

    gbritnell

    gbritnell

    gbritnell

    Project of the Month Winner!!! Project of the Month Winner

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    2,618
    Likes Received:
    552
  8. Jun 11, 2019 #108

    SailplaneDriver

    SailplaneDriver

    SailplaneDriver

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2017
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    13
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired Electrical Engineer
    Location:
    Woodinville, WA
    Got started on one of the heads. Figured I'd do one complete which will probably wind up as a practice run. Here it is with the head bolt holes drilled and countersunk, and the pushrod holes. The plans show a standard 5.5:1 compression ratio with an option for 8:1. Is there an advantage of one over the other? I know that higher comression typically results in higher power output but this is a working display model.

    IMG_20190610_164605.jpg
     
  9. Jun 11, 2019 #109

    stevehuckss396

    stevehuckss396

    stevehuckss396

    Model Engineer Project of the Month Winner HMEM Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Messages:
    4,083
    Likes Received:
    1,012
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Construction
    Location:
    Sterling Heights, MI
    The higher compression ratio will give more power. It will also put more stress on the pistons, wrist pins, rods, and crankshaft. It will also affect the ability of the engine to idle down. I built the prototype Demon with the 5.5:1 ratio because it is a display and will never do any real work.
     
  10. Jun 11, 2019 #110

    retailer

    retailer

    retailer

    Junior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2011
    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    40
    You look to be getting on with it at a good pace, I'm still working on the block and crankshaft and have not yet finished the head drawings - I checked out the crankshaft building posts made by gbritnell, well worth a look, he does some really good work - much better than I'll ever be.
     
  11. Jun 11, 2019 #111

    SailplaneDriver

    SailplaneDriver

    SailplaneDriver

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2017
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    13
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired Electrical Engineer
    Location:
    Woodinville, WA
    I keep getting stalled with either lack of material or tooling. I just got the long LOC end mills I ordered so I can try and finish up the oil pan and get the block bored for the cam and crank. I looked at gbritnell link. I think he's forgotten more than I know about this stuff - and his work is first rate.
     
  12. Jul 22, 2019 #112

    SailplaneDriver

    SailplaneDriver

    SailplaneDriver

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2017
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    13
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired Electrical Engineer
    Location:
    Woodinville, WA
    I got the two heads mostly done and have found a mistake.

    IMG_20190722_145446.jpg

    Bottom looks good and matches the drawings.

    IMG_20190722_145502.jpg

    Problem is in the top. The valve locations are off on the top but not on the bottom. The rocker stud locations break into the valve bores. :mad: This really sucks. I put a lot of time into these. Now I have to figure out what I did wrong.
     
  13. Jul 23, 2019 #113

    bob shutt

    bob shutt

    bob shutt

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2010
    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    52
    From what I can see from the pictures it looks like your .875, .912, and .666 are not measured at the 22 deg. Page 27 of the plans
     
  14. Jul 24, 2019 #114

    SailplaneDriver

    SailplaneDriver

    SailplaneDriver

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2017
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    13
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired Electrical Engineer
    Location:
    Woodinville, WA
    Yes. I misunderstood the plans and thought the dimensions were on the plane of the head bottom, not with the head angled at 22 deg. I will have to redo them.
     
  15. Jul 31, 2019 #115

    retailer

    retailer

    retailer

    Junior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2011
    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    40
    It's a bummer when that sort of thing happens not sure about you but for me when I make those sort of mistakes I can never make up my mind if the loss of time or loss of material is worse.
     
  16. Aug 8, 2019 #116

    SailplaneDriver

    SailplaneDriver

    SailplaneDriver

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2017
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    13
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired Electrical Engineer
    Location:
    Woodinville, WA
    Got both of the heads done. I got two good onesout of five tries. Now to try the crankshaft.

    IMG_20190805_161310.jpg

    Progress so far.

    IMG_20190805_131726.jpg
     
  17. Aug 9, 2019 #117

    davidyat

    davidyat

    davidyat

    Well-Known Member HMEM Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2012
    Messages:
    177
    Likes Received:
    38
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired/Self Taught Machinist
    Location:
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    OH, how many times have I misunderstood plans. 22 degrees is not the same as O degrees. GGGRRRHHH and I never throw away my mistakes. I keep them to remind me, "Don't do that again!!!"
    Grasshopper
     
    Shane1971 likes this.
  18. Aug 18, 2019 #118

    SailplaneDriver

    SailplaneDriver

    SailplaneDriver

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2017
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    13
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired Electrical Engineer
    Location:
    Woodinville, WA
    I was practicing making a crankshaft out of aluminum 6160. Sequence was to do the rod journals first then the mains starting from the front and going to the rear with the rear driven and the stock between centers. I milled out much of the excess but only for the journal I was working on. Got the 1-2 journal done without drama. It grabbed on the 3-4 journal, bent at the 1-2 journal and spit it out.

    Is aluminum too soft to try this or was it just lousy technique?

    IMG_20190818_150700.jpg
     
  19. Aug 18, 2019 #119

    davidyat

    davidyat

    davidyat

    Well-Known Member HMEM Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2012
    Messages:
    177
    Likes Received:
    38
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired/Self Taught Machinist
    Location:
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    What worked for me when I was making Bazmak's 2 times Cirrus Compressed Air V-8 and botching up 3 cranks, was to do the mains first. Then with the crank in the offset jigs, using a parting tool (about 0.125 wide) to start on the rod journals. Start from the tail stock and work on the journals towards the chuck. After each rod journal is made, make some biscuits to slip into the rod journal space that you just made rather snugly. Then when you go to the next journal, give a little snug pressure on the off set jig in the tailstock with the biscuit and this should give you some stability. It's time consuming with the cut off blade, but you shouldn't twist another crank.
    Grasshopper
     
  20. Aug 19, 2019 #120

    retailer

    retailer

    retailer

    Junior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2011
    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    40
    Quite a few forum members (me included) find that if the bulk of the metal is machined away in the mill there is less chance of a disaster in the lathe.

    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page