I have built a number of 1" bore internal combustion engines, using Viton 0-rings. The o-rings I use are 1" o.d. x 0.070" cross section, and I use one ring per cylinder. I use a 0.093" parting off tool and cut the groove 0.056" to 0.058" deep. My reasoning was, that if the o-ring is 0.070" cross section and the o-ring groove is 0.058" deep, then that gives a radial "squeeze" of 0.012". My engines run quite well with these numbers, but my hit and miss engines never have very long "miss" cycles. I have recently been following videos posted by Andrew Whale from the United Kingdom, and on his build of the "Hoglet" engine which has a 1" bore, he makes his ring grooves 0.080" deep---and they work fine. This sounds wrong to me, that the depth of the ring groove is 0.010" deeper than the cross section of the actual 0.070" o-ring. However, he gets good compression with his 0.080" deep ring grooves and his engines seem to run fine when completed. Now, if Andrew is right and I am wrong, that could explain why my hit and miss engines have such short "miss" intervals.---I have too much friction between the piston and the cylinder the way I am doing it. I have an extra 1" bore cylinder here, and a 1" piston to go with it. I just set the piston up in my lathe and took the ring groove down to a depth of 0.080", and then put a 1" viton ring in the deepened groove. I assembled it with the cylinder, and yes, it seems to have lots of compression!!! I am shocked!!! I guess the next test for me will be to take one of my existing hit and miss engines, remove the piston and deepen the ring groove to 0.080", then reassemble the engine and run it to see if my "miss" cycles become longer.---Who Knew!!!