Owen_N
Well-Known Member
This is intended for discussion of odd features of performance two-stroke engines.
The one that I am interested is the "wobbly exhaust passage".
this seems to be very long, with a semi-elliptical outlet.
I would have thought the outer exhaust ports could merge at about 30 degrees into the first exhaust chamber, which can be oval or round, and about a cm out from the centre of the main port.
The full port depth in the middle isn't used for the blowdown process, so a chamber of the area of the centre port would be sufficient.
the outer edge of the merged tubes could be radiused.
the wobbly sec is outlet of 75% of the port area.
I am not sure how the inlet to the exhaust is normally proportioned.
Is it about 30 diameter for a 50cc, 36mm diameter for a 125cc, or more?
by area-radius proportion, if 125 is 36, then 50cc = 22.
22mm is the size for a low-rev 60cc, 6-7500 rpm range.
I would expect it to be bigger for a 17500 rpm 50cc engine= or 17850rpm , as suggested by Jan Thiel in one of his articles.
if the 50 goes to 30mm, then the 125 x sqrt (2.25) (1.5) = 45mm. Is this too large??
A normal YZ125 carb is 38mm, but do the disc valve 125s go any bigger? - they both run around the 13,000 rpm mark.
I was thinking 35mm flat slide for a 50 with a fully open resonant intake, but 28mm may be better.
I have a sizing formula for 2-strok3es here- I will study it.
Back to the "Wobbly" exhaust channel. Its very long side channels could be intended to help channel the reflected pulse into the secondary exhaust ports.
This reflection may not like a rounded 30 degree intersection, with side pipes around 18mm in diameter?
<edit>
Here is the image of the "wobbly" exhaust duct.
It doesn't seem to show the transition to the actual exhaust. - the view here looks like about 2/3 of the bore , or 36mm for a 54 mm bore.
This actually sounds not to bad for a 125 cc.
For the exhaust header, an inside bend radius about 3x the bore, seems to be common.
The "wobbly" exhaust duct was designed by Wayne Wright, an associate of Frits Overmar and Jan Thiel,
and the image is an extract from the JanBros pdf.
Another feature of the Aprilia is the wide, rounded main port.
I think that the main port should be more square and narrower, and move the extra port width to the secondary exhaust ports.
The Aprilia could be like this to make better use of the exhaust power valve.
These are not required for pure speed engines, as long as you can make the transitions between gears.
A streamliner really needs an expensive side-loader 6 speed box, with plenty of different ratio choice.
I will just be going for "engine numbers" only , and leave out the actual streamliner stage.
I will also work with 95 RON fuel, as a benchmark.
I will see if I can combine a pipe engine with 8.0:1 effective CR, and this fuel.
Building power high in the rev range seems to reduce knock sensitivity a bit, and I am sure there are a few other tricks.
Instrumentation to detect onset of detonation, or seizure, sounds useful.
Seizure usually occurs in my experience when the piston skirt gets too hot for good lubrication, and can occur even when the piston
clearance has not been fully used up by heat expansion.
It is a risk when retaining heat in the expansion chamber, or using the full restrictor as with the FOS style pipe.
This carries heat back with the supercharge reverse pulse, and makes for more chamber heat.
Some engines are especially touchy in the overrev part of the rev range. Less efficient chamber evacuation could be part of this.
Some other engines add extra holes in the piston sides to assist with piston cooling, but you cannot do this with a full-circle skirt.
I see some pistons have an indent on the "cold side", but no actual hole.
Making the skirt longer , and/or moving the piston pin further away from the piston crown, are possible solutions.
This means the con-rod should be longer, too, around 1.9 to 2:1 x the stroke.
Are any more than this?
The one that I am interested is the "wobbly exhaust passage".
this seems to be very long, with a semi-elliptical outlet.
I would have thought the outer exhaust ports could merge at about 30 degrees into the first exhaust chamber, which can be oval or round, and about a cm out from the centre of the main port.
The full port depth in the middle isn't used for the blowdown process, so a chamber of the area of the centre port would be sufficient.
the outer edge of the merged tubes could be radiused.
the wobbly sec is outlet of 75% of the port area.
I am not sure how the inlet to the exhaust is normally proportioned.
Is it about 30 diameter for a 50cc, 36mm diameter for a 125cc, or more?
by area-radius proportion, if 125 is 36, then 50cc = 22.
22mm is the size for a low-rev 60cc, 6-7500 rpm range.
I would expect it to be bigger for a 17500 rpm 50cc engine= or 17850rpm , as suggested by Jan Thiel in one of his articles.
if the 50 goes to 30mm, then the 125 x sqrt (2.25) (1.5) = 45mm. Is this too large??
A normal YZ125 carb is 38mm, but do the disc valve 125s go any bigger? - they both run around the 13,000 rpm mark.
I was thinking 35mm flat slide for a 50 with a fully open resonant intake, but 28mm may be better.
I have a sizing formula for 2-strok3es here- I will study it.
Back to the "Wobbly" exhaust channel. Its very long side channels could be intended to help channel the reflected pulse into the secondary exhaust ports.
This reflection may not like a rounded 30 degree intersection, with side pipes around 18mm in diameter?
<edit>
Here is the image of the "wobbly" exhaust duct.
It doesn't seem to show the transition to the actual exhaust. - the view here looks like about 2/3 of the bore , or 36mm for a 54 mm bore.
This actually sounds not to bad for a 125 cc.
For the exhaust header, an inside bend radius about 3x the bore, seems to be common.
The "wobbly" exhaust duct was designed by Wayne Wright, an associate of Frits Overmar and Jan Thiel,
and the image is an extract from the JanBros pdf.
Another feature of the Aprilia is the wide, rounded main port.
I think that the main port should be more square and narrower, and move the extra port width to the secondary exhaust ports.
The Aprilia could be like this to make better use of the exhaust power valve.
These are not required for pure speed engines, as long as you can make the transitions between gears.
A streamliner really needs an expensive side-loader 6 speed box, with plenty of different ratio choice.
I will just be going for "engine numbers" only , and leave out the actual streamliner stage.
I will also work with 95 RON fuel, as a benchmark.
I will see if I can combine a pipe engine with 8.0:1 effective CR, and this fuel.
Building power high in the rev range seems to reduce knock sensitivity a bit, and I am sure there are a few other tricks.
Instrumentation to detect onset of detonation, or seizure, sounds useful.
Seizure usually occurs in my experience when the piston skirt gets too hot for good lubrication, and can occur even when the piston
clearance has not been fully used up by heat expansion.
It is a risk when retaining heat in the expansion chamber, or using the full restrictor as with the FOS style pipe.
This carries heat back with the supercharge reverse pulse, and makes for more chamber heat.
Some engines are especially touchy in the overrev part of the rev range. Less efficient chamber evacuation could be part of this.
Some other engines add extra holes in the piston sides to assist with piston cooling, but you cannot do this with a full-circle skirt.
I see some pistons have an indent on the "cold side", but no actual hole.
Making the skirt longer , and/or moving the piston pin further away from the piston crown, are possible solutions.
This means the con-rod should be longer, too, around 1.9 to 2:1 x the stroke.
Are any more than this?
Attachments
Last edited: