Runner
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2011
- Messages
- 124
- Reaction score
- 17
Hi,
I made myself a quick and dirty live centre. The design utilised a MT2 Morse Taper with a machineable straight shank that was reduced in size to fit the shaft diameter of a single roller bearing. The housing was made and incorporated the centre, which was similar in form to the dead centre. The MT2 Morse taper was loctited to the shaft diameter of the bearing and similarly the housing was loctited to the OD of the bearing. This design was opposite to general practice in so much that the body rotated instead of the shaft. I assume that this is OK. However, although the roller bearing was new and Japanese manufacture, the Morse Taper and housing could be flexed with regard to each other indicating that there was some play in the bearing. Undaunted I tried it out. The live centre didn't rotate because, I assume, that contact surface and or contact force to the work piece was inadequate. The contact force was increased and the live centre rotated but the play in the bearing manifest itself by a slight wobble of the centre and because of the increased contact force the bearing quickly got worse. Thinking about the latter point the bearing is not designed for a sideways force, the live centre required a thrust bearing of some sort, but how is this feature realised in professionally made live centres? I would be grateful for any comments on where I went wrong in my design.
I have decided that I should purchase a live centre, being so cheap. However, maybe the cheap ones are no better than mine. So I would like any recommendations and or points to look for when purchasing one.
Regards,
Brian
I made myself a quick and dirty live centre. The design utilised a MT2 Morse Taper with a machineable straight shank that was reduced in size to fit the shaft diameter of a single roller bearing. The housing was made and incorporated the centre, which was similar in form to the dead centre. The MT2 Morse taper was loctited to the shaft diameter of the bearing and similarly the housing was loctited to the OD of the bearing. This design was opposite to general practice in so much that the body rotated instead of the shaft. I assume that this is OK. However, although the roller bearing was new and Japanese manufacture, the Morse Taper and housing could be flexed with regard to each other indicating that there was some play in the bearing. Undaunted I tried it out. The live centre didn't rotate because, I assume, that contact surface and or contact force to the work piece was inadequate. The contact force was increased and the live centre rotated but the play in the bearing manifest itself by a slight wobble of the centre and because of the increased contact force the bearing quickly got worse. Thinking about the latter point the bearing is not designed for a sideways force, the live centre required a thrust bearing of some sort, but how is this feature realised in professionally made live centres? I would be grateful for any comments on where I went wrong in my design.
I have decided that I should purchase a live centre, being so cheap. However, maybe the cheap ones are no better than mine. So I would like any recommendations and or points to look for when purchasing one.
Regards,
Brian