A Stuart Turner Triple Expansion Engine

[Hilmar]

A Stuart Turner Triple Expansion Engine is borne.

   I did buy the castings in the 1970s. We moved once in between and I lost all the Bronze castings.
Still have most, not all of the cast iron castings. I think it is time to start after 37 Years.
And this is the Start.
   If some one tells you it:” Is easy to work from castings” don’t believe it. Only if you have good ones and they are a bit oversize, other wise you have a heck of a time to get there. These are not the best one. There is a problem with the cylinder ports.
  I will take pictures on a continues bases but it is slow going.
   The decision has to be made if I should continuous with this post or just drop it.
Also the moderator may put the post in a different spot. I don’t know if this is the right one.
Is there a spell checker some where?
Hilmar

[gbritnell]

Hi Hilmar,
I have done quite a few Stuart kits over the years and have found them to be quite well done. You're correct on the amount of stock for finishing but with judicious layout it gives you less to cut. The iron has always been a very close grain and machines great leaving very sharp edges. I have done other peoples castings and was much less impressed with the quality. I have seen very few Stuart triples over the years but they are something to see when completed.
gbritnell

[Tin Falcon]

I have only heard good things about stuart kits. . And have admired the triple expansion engines they a classic marine design. But they must run on steam compressed air does not cut it without a modification.
Tin

[Hilmar]

Hi Tin

What is with the modification?
Hilmar

[Tin Falcon]

Hilmar:
IIRC there is a couple of things you can do. It has to do with feeding the cylinders pressure  1 you can feed air to the largest cylinder and let the others run free or you can feed air direct to all cylinders . The double or triple expansion does not work with air.
Tin

[gbritnell]

Without getting too wordy, steam is a working gas, meaning it has life. When the slide valve shuts off the supply of steam it keeps working, therefore even though it has a reduced pressure coming out of the exhaust it still has life (or work) left in it and can be used to power one, two or even three more cylinders. On the other hand compressed air only works when the valve is open. Once the supply is shut off there is no more work. The problem with admitting air to every cylinder in a compound or triple expansion is that there is uneven pressure applied to the crankshaft becuause of the surface area of the pistons. Just for round numbers lets say that you have 30 lbs. of air applied to a 1 inch piston. The pressure on the piston would be 23.56 lbs. Now you take an 1.50 piston and the pressure would be 53 lbs. Although the engine would run it would be very erratic in perfomance. You could feed the largest cylinder only but it here again it wouldn't run very smoothly because it would be fighting the friction of all the other cylinders and their mechanisms and linkages.
gbritnell

[loggerhogger]

I too have the Stuart triple kit. I haven't started on it yet, but one thing that I found has helped me when machining the cylenders from castings. I found that if I machine the valve face first, then I can drive a wooden plug into the cylender hole, (it's not a "bore" yet) :lol:  and then us that to find the center of the bore from the valve face. mark it on the wooden plug, use that to center it on your lathe, drive the plug out and go to work.

[Hilmar]

Tin .
I  understand what you where saying .
I was thinking there  was a mechanical modification in print or so.

I have two print sets, one from 5/2/55 which came with the casting in the
late 60s.
  The second set is dated 19 April 1977 by Willis. I don't know where it cam from. Could be from Coles in CA.
So fare I came up on two different Dimensions. A P.I.T.A. when you partly
in to machining it.

Gbritnell.
    A good explanation.  Also in real life a Triple Expansion is basically
like a single cylinder  Not self starting. If the HP Cylinder is TDC it just sits there. Then the machinist had by change of valves get the steam in one of the other cylinders to get is off TDC.

I did some more work on the Triple.Pictures will be fort coming.
Also I have some more gadgets may be I should post them under Tools
Hilmar

[compound driver]

HI
The valve is caled a "simpeling valve" as you say it feeds steam into the high pressure and nudges the thing off TDC. Most compound traction engines use the same idea. Or if your my mate paul and too tight to rebuild the valve on his Fowler you pull the flywheel round whilst standing on the motion!

Never had a problem with any stewart castings and im on my fourth engine.

make yourself a boiler and run it on steam nothing better and as stated before compunding wont work on air.

Steam is king! LOL

[Hilmar]

Some more photos from the Triple.
 I am cutting the Piston Rods and Cross heads. Notice the Slitting Saw I am using.
It is for a portable Trim Saw. The Carbide blade I bought from Home Depot for about nine $$ and change. Cuts true metal like butter. The slot is 0.050” and clean.
Hilmar

[Mcgyver]

Hi Hilmar, the engine is looking great - i like the slitting saw idea too  


I'm also working on one.  several years ago I came to the point of working on the steam pipes, got sidetracked and have been building tooling every since.  

time to get back to working on the triple  here's a pic of mine

http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b201/michael0100/Stuart%20Triple%20Expansion/st2.jpg

what sort of port trouble are you having?

[Mcgyver]

dup, sorry  :oops:

[Hilmar]

Mcgyver,  
    the castings had pits and holes in them. The valve ports had pits and where not parallel and also oversize. I will have to see how it works out. How did You finished the Crankshaft. One piece or put together. Also how do You make out with the two start thread for the reverse change?
Hilmar

[Mcgyver]

that's too bad about the ports.  i made the crank shaft from the solid, only way to go imo.  The silver soldered fabrication that comes with the kit makes a better pretzel blank than crankshaft blank, its just too flimsy to work with.  The crankshaft came out beautifully from the solid.  I used free cutting steel to give myself a fighting chance.  No, free cutting is not the best material for a crankshaft, but its a model not a lawn mower engine  Also, I made the counterweights from steel.  I had made them from the cast iron provided and first one i try to peen on split.  dang.  maybe that tip will save you some time

two start thread is still to be done, and it looks challenging.  Current thinking is to make a progressive tap or several taps each taking out a percentage of thread depth.  I want to get the torque on each down to a minimum.  the taps won't have to be very long which helps.  that said, i still expect it to be tricky, I've made taps but not that small.

[Bogstandard]

Hilmar,
The way to go is to cut the multistart on the lathe, is is really easy to do if you just do it logically. It is just getting into a routine of dropping in on one threading dial number then repeating for the second start on another number before putting any more cut on. It is just done in equal stages, a bit off one start then a bit off the next. Don't try to cut one full start then attempt to cut the second, it just won't work properly.
I am sure that a man who has got as far as this on this build could easily tackle multi start threads. Practice on a bit of scrap first.
If you can make a multi start tap you can make the cut direct and cut out the middle bit.
I find it easier to make the cuts by not feeding onto the forward cutting face, but onto the reverse face, this takes all the pressure off the cutter and I end up with a much better multistart thread. That goes for both internal and external cutting.
But you do need your lathe running as slow as possible.

Mcgyver,
Still being sidetracked by your massive learning curve in electronics. Have you finished those damned flanges yet.

John