6 Cyl Radial Air Eng (GrabCad)

Home Model Engine Machinist Forum

Help Support Home Model Engine Machinist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Jmccrack

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
144
Reaction score
20
So I have spent many hours building all the parts and pieces for this six-cylinder engine. I put it together and I seem to have a problem with it. When I rotate it by hand the center wheel that holds all the conrods seems to fall behind in rotation to the crank shaft. What happens is the conrod bind up against the cylinder edge. The center wheel is free running no binding and all the Pistons move easily in the cylinders. Am I missing something.

upload_2018-9-2_18-54-0.jpeg



upload_2018-9-2_18-54-52.jpeg


As you can see the Conrad is hitting the edge of the cylinder. Sometimes it runs well and it is not always the same cylinder. Any thoughts?
 
Are all the con-rods free to move on that 'center wheel'? Normally, radial engines have a 'master rod' which is fixed in relation to the 'center wheel' you mention and all the other rods are attached to it. This keeps everything in correct orientation and eliminated the binding you are experiencing, as well as ensuring correct piston timing and stroke as well. I don't think the engine will work without such a master-rod arrangement.

Something along the lines of this arrangement:

radial rod.jpg
 
Are all the con-rods free to move on that 'center wheel'? Normally, radial engines have a 'master rod' which is fixed in relation to the 'center wheel' you mention and all the other rods are attached to it. This keeps everything in correct orientation and eliminated the binding you are experiencing, as well as ensuring correct piston timing and stroke as well. I don't think the engine will work without such a master-rod arrangement.

Something along the lines of this arrangement:

View attachment 103801
 
I had no idea. So you are saying in a radial one con rod is fixed? Thank you so much for that. I will try to fix one rod.
 
Been it an air motor I don't think that is a problem, I want to remember that is something with the timing, but radials I think, got always an odd number of cylinders.
 
I am really confused now. Even when I turn it by hand the Conrad will sometimes bind up. Almost as if the center is not keeping up with the pistons. It can’t be timing because I am only turning it by hand.
 
Thank you so much for the guys. So now I’m gonna go out and try to figure out how to make one of these rods a master rod. Should be interesting because they’re all meant to move right now. Again thanks a lot I will keep you informed
 
GOT IT! I will silver solder the master rod in place.
 
You are right. Works like a charm now. Interesting I got this drawing from GrabCad. Nice plans and a great 3D exploded view. But no master rod on the drawing. If anyone uses these plans make that modification. Thanks again for the help.
 
Good day,
I am not familiar to the type of engine you have built. Aircraft radial engines use an odd number of cylinders in each row.
Single row use 7 or 9. Twin row 2 x 7 or 2 x 9 etc.
Your con rod arrangement may be out of whack. I will chase up a picture and post it.
50+ years since I completed my apprenticeship.
I hope this helps and I have not confused the whole thing.
Regards, Dennis
 
Good day again,
Here is a picture of a Pratt and Whitney twin row Wasp (2X 7) crank.
I hope this also helps.
Regards,
Dennis Thanks to Pratt and Whitney photo site.
 

Attachments

  • F166FC31-4E46-43E2-8149-8937CC7EC077.png
    F166FC31-4E46-43E2-8149-8937CC7EC077.png
    332.3 KB · Views: 360
Last edited:
Don't trust any of the things you find on Grabcad. They are not vetted for accuracy or buildability. Any amateur can post something there, correct or not.---Brian
 
All AC engines as you describe "with a master connecting rod" have odd numbers of cylinders. They have too, or they do not work for the same reason you have now. However, the Germans attached their connecting rods directing to the crank shaft, not in an outer orbital plane as yours, in some of their engines. By connecting directly they could achieve even numbers of pistons around each section of the connecting rod, and the engine could be made more compact, thus fitting in a smaller space. Do a search on "Fock Wolf 190", and see some of the cut-away pictures of the engine used to get an idea of the design.
 
upload_2018-9-5_10-26-9.png

upload_2018-9-5_10-26-47.png

upload_2018-9-5_10-27-18.png


upload_2018-9-5_10-28-0.png



upload_2018-9-5_10-28-32.jpeg



upload_2018-9-5_10-29-52.jpeg


upload_2018-9-5_10-30-22.jpeg



upload_2018-9-5_10-31-3.jpeg


So here is some interesting drawings to look at. I have built all these parts and by changing one rod to a master rod it turns over by hand very easily. I posted the drawings because when I put air to it it does not rotate. I think it has something to do with the air Valve. As you can see the brass air valve sits on an eccentric shaft and as the crank turns moves over the port that injects air to the top of the cylinder. When I inject air into each port on its own it will drive the piston down no problem. I have not seen this type of valve arrangement before. It should work. Any thoughts? Again Brian this is from GrabCad. I may now have learned my lesson..
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-9-5_10-29-5.jpeg
    upload_2018-9-5_10-29-5.jpeg
    43.2 KB · Views: 326
This is May first radial. But I was wondering. Would the firing order (air in) be 123456. Or something different?
 
Jmccrack, Where I.C. radials fire every other cylinder yours would be a 2 stroke and fire each cylinder as it rotates. I don't know how you number your cylinders or which direction it is suppose to run but each cylinder would fire (air in) as it rotates.

Gary
 
Back
Top