PM Research No. 1 Build

Home Model Engine Machinist Forum

Help Support Home Model Engine Machinist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
That looks just dandy Brian Thm:

Oh yes - Happy Birthday !

Kind regards, Arnold
 
rhitee93 said:
It is funny you mention that because I am struggling with this idea. I want to round over the top edge a bit, however I know that in the real world, the round edge was supposed to be on the bottom and the flat side was up.

Wait, what? Have I been putting nuts on the wrong way around all this time? The only online discussion I could find was http://powerlineman.com/lforum/archive/index.php/t-7628.html, which has all kinds of opinions :)

Simon
 
For model nuts, I use...

D = major bolt diameter

1.5*D = across flats nut size
0.9*D = nut thickness

I've always mounted nuts with the chamfer/rounded side up. I'll be interested to hear an argument for inverting that choice.
 
Perhaps I am wrong about the nuts.

In my circles, conventional wisdom with hardware on antique machinery is that nuts that have a chamfer on only one side are installed chamfer side down so that the corners on the flat side don't scar the mating surface for the nut.

I can't say that I have ever heard an authority on the subject.
 
Your argument makes sense. Modern commercial nuts are often chamfered on both sides. If the chamfer is there for your purpose, as opposed to just making them burr-free, then it would be logical to chamfer both sides so the operator can't get it wrong.
 
Nuts.........where to place the chamfer.

My understanding is that a nut with the chamfer on one side, is that the non chamfered side goes against the mating face as an aid to locking when using only a flat washer under the nut. Without a washer it will bite into the parent part but IMHO this still the more correct way to fit such a nut. IIRC the chamfer was originally fitted to facilitate easy engagement of a ring spanner/socket as well as removing unnecessary sharp corners in way exposed edges.

Best Regards
Bob
 
Maryak said:
IIRC the chamfer was originally fitted to facilitate easy engagement of a ring spanner/socket as well as removing unnecessary sharp corners in way exposed edges.

Best Regards
Bob

Agree

Don
 
I agree with Bob,

This was debated heavily a few years ago on one of the antique engine mailing lists. The majority of the folks agreed the chamfer should face up. This was for square nuts.

But; antique High Crown Hex Nuts and Bolts are a different animal. They have a releaf turned on the bottom to keep the hex points from digging in and the tops of the nuts are chamfered.

The bolts are made two different ways; it seems the on some engines they have a radius on top and on some engines they had the high crown but a flat top with a chamfer.

One of my old engines from the teens has the flat top bolts; I’m really not sure why the difference. I have also seen the nuts with a radius instead of the chamfer on some engines.

You can see on my Pacific how I did the main bearing cap nuts; I feel that this is the proper way, releaf on the bottom and chamfer on top.

http://www.homemodelenginemachinist.com/index.php?topic=18682.45

Also I have up loaded a drawing I found on Harry’s antique engine (I don’ think that it is copyrighted) that shows the dimensions for some full sized hardware.

http://www.homemodelenginemachinist.com/index.php?action=tpmod;dl=item405

The Pacific will have the High Crown Bolts with the radius on top because they look proper and are cool.

Dave
 
Dave,

I like your approach with the chamfer on top and the rebated section on the bottom. I think I'll do that with the nuts on this engine.

 
OK, let the great nut debate end :) (For this build anyway) I used Dave's approach and rebated the mating side and chamfered the top side. The difference is subtle, and doesn't show up in the photos well. However it does appear more finished now, and I think it was an hour well spent.

IMG_1821.jpg



IMG_1822.jpg
 
The nuts look good; much better that the sharp points of the hex.


Dave
 
Love them!

Simon
 
Looking good Brian, are we going to see a video? th_wwp

Don
 
Patience Don, I have a few more parts to either paint or polish and some 3-48 hardware to make yet :)
 
The details are important, every edge or face added reflects light in a slightly different way and adds to the richness of the appearance. Seems to me when there is enough detail it starts looking real and a combination of a good paint job and that detail make your engine look just that.

Jan
 
Hi Brian not trying to rush you, finishing an engine to me is the fun part. It has to be just right, because this is what sets it off from just a raw engine. I am anxious to set it finished. You have done a great job so far.

Don
 
I'm just teasing you Don. Your attention to polishing the parts on your engines is one of the things that has gotten me to slow down and pay attention to the details. I usually struggle to maintain my patience during the finishing stages of a project.

I didn't get much done today, but I did manage to get the flywheel ready for its final coats of paint. The hub and the outside of the rim are taped off, but I left the edges of the rim unmasked. I'll take a cleanup pass on the sides after the color is on. Wet sanding between coats means I have to re-mask each coat, and taping off the edge of the rim was a pain.

100_2072.jpg


I also got the 3-48 studs made for the main bearing caps. I didn't take any photos since it was basically the same process I used before. Thankfully, the list of hardware I still need to make is starting to get short :)

100_2075.jpg
 
Very nicely done Brian.

But don't go overboard with the flatting down, you have to remember, it is made from castings, and a little bit of that must show, otherwise you may as well have made it from barstock.

It is a very fine line between getting an engine to a highly polished example of a real one, more like a showman's engine, rather than an example of a scaled down version of a full sized working example.

I am just showing my Scott flame licker build, and I can polish and paint that to whatever depths I want to go to, because it isn't a scale model, just a 'looker', but other engines I will be building from castings, you should just be able to detect their casting based origins.

But of course, that is just my personal view. It's your engine, you do whatever you want.


John
 

Latest posts

Back
Top